ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2026
Implementation mapping to develop strategies for skin-to-skin care in the pediatric cardiac intensive care unit: planning for a hybrid trial.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Skin-to-skin care (SSC) is an evidence-based developmental practice that improves physiological stability, neurodevelopment, and parental well-being in hospitalized neonates. Although feasible and safe for neonates with complex congenital heart disease (cCHD) in the pediatric cardiac intensive care unit (PCICU), SSC remains underused due to knowledge gaps, unclear roles, safety concerns, inconsistent communication, and a lack of peer support. Methods: We used implementation mapping to identify determinants of SSC implementation in two United States (U.S.) PCICUs to design a targeted, theory-informed strategy package in preparation for a hybrid type II trial. Semi-structured interviews with clinicians ( Results: Key barriers included limited SSC training, unclear responsibilities for initiation, safety concerns, inconsistent communication, and a lack of peer support. Three primary strategies were co-developed with stakeholders: (1) Education with role clarification, (2) Audit and feedback, and (3) Internal peer-to-peer facilitation. The logic model describes mechanisms such as improved knowledge, confidence, and role clarity; reinforcement through feedback; and peer modeling leading to improved adoption, feasibility, and sustainability of SSC. Conclusions: This streamlined, end-user informed strategy package addresses the main barriers to SSC implementation in the PCICU and offers a replicable model for linking determinants to strategies in acute care settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.