Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42344080›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine

Betting on Blue Light: VELscope Versus Conventional Oral Examination in the High-Stakes Game of Oral Lesion Detection among Gujarat's Tobacco Users.

Ruchit Nawal, Nishita Sarvaiya, Mohit Nareshbhai Makwana, Atul Trivedi, Shashank Pandya, Devang A Raval, Bhanuprasad Kotadiya, Rohini Patel, Anand Shah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ruchit NawalDepartment of Community Medicine, B. J. Medical College, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
Nishita SarvaiyaDepartment of Community Medicine, B. J. Medical College, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
Mohit Nareshbhai MakwanaCommunity Oncology Department, The Gujarat Cancer and Research Institute, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
Atul TrivediDepartment of Community Medicine, B. J. Medical College, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
Shashank PandyaCommunity Oncology Department, The Gujarat Cancer and Research Institute, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
Devang A RavalDepartment of Community Medicine, B. J. Medical College, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
Bhanuprasad KotadiyaDepartment of Community Medicine, B. J. Medical College, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
Rohini PatelCommunity Oncology Department, The Gujarat Cancer and Research Institute, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
Anand ShahCommunity Oncology Department, The Gujarat Cancer and Research Institute, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Oral cancer is a significant health burden in India, with 143,759 new cases in 2022. In Gujarat state, where tobacco consumption is 25.1% among adults, early detection of oral lesions has been a challenge with conventional oral examination methods. Objective: This study assessed the use of VELscope (Visual Enhanced Light scope) as an adjunctive tool to Conventional Oral Examination (COE) for identifying oral lesions among tobacco users. Materials and Methods: This observational cross-sectional diagnostic study at The Gujarat Cancer and Research Institute enrolled 310 tobacco users through consecutive sampling during January to February 2024. Participants underwent standardized COE under white light, followed by VELscope examination. Primary outcomes were oral lesion detection by COE and VELscope. This study did not confirm the oral lesions with histopathological examination. Results: Among 310 participants, 96.8% were males and 3.2% were females. The mean age of participants was 42.3 ± 11.7 years. VELscope detected 659 areas of fluorescence alteration, while COE detected 245 lesions. VELscope showed 414 additional lesions which were not appreciated during COE, including Discoloration (63%), OSMF (62.9%), Leukoplakia (62.6%), Erythroplakia (63.3%). Conclusion: VELscope identified more visual changes than Conventional Oral Examination and may serve as an adjunctive tool in oral cancer screening programs. Further studies with histopathological correlation are warranted.

Indexed as

Autofluorescence imagingoral cancer screeningoral potentially malignant disorderstobacco usersVELscope

Identifiers

PMID42344080
PMCPMC13289984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.