ReviewBMJ public health2026
Integrating mortality surveillance as a routine component of national essential public health functions: a blueprint for action.
Review in BMJ public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic and other recent public health responses have highlighted significant challenges in global mortality data collection, with approximately 40% of deaths unregistered and fragmented reporting systems hampering public health responses. This paper supports the establishment of routine mortality surveillance as a core function of essential public health services, emphasising the need for integration with civil registration and vital statistics (CRVS) systems. By leveraging existing frameworks and proposing a Theory of Change (ToC), we outline critical linkages between CRVS and mortality surveillance that enhance data accuracy, timeliness and utility for public health decision-making. The paper provides examples across key enablers-policies, agreements and legislation; infrastructure; governance, funding and resources; and people and organisational culture-that facilitate these linkages. We also present examples from initiatives like the Africa CDC's Mortality Surveillance Programme to illustrate effective strategies in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The ToC serves as a blueprint for stakeholders to implement strategic interventions aimed at overcoming barriers to linking systems and data integration and utilisation. Ultimately, this paper underscores the importance of coordinated efforts among national public health agencies, civil registration authorities and other stakeholders to improve mortality data systems globally. By addressing these systemic challenges through enhanced collaboration and technological innovation, we can significantly advance public health outcomes and policy formulation in response to future health crises.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.