ArticleBMJ public health2026
Understanding challenges and opportunities to implement preconception iron and folic acid supplementation to prevent neural tube defects and iron deficiency anaemia in Ethiopian health care system: a qualitative study.
Article in BMJ public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Preconception iron and folic acid supplementation (IFAS) is a key intervention to prevent neural tube defects (NTDs) and maternal and child iron deficiency anaemia (IDA). Despite its potential benefits, many healthcare systems rarely provide preconception IFAS to women who plan to become pregnant and mothers with a history of spontaneous abortion who declined contraceptive use. The aim of this study was to explore stakeholder perspectives on the challenges and opportunities for implementing preconception IFAS for these high-risk groups in the Ethiopian healthcare system, a country with a high burden of NTDs and IDA. Methods: An exploratory qualitative study was conducted among 45 participants, including women attending antenatal care, women planning pregnancy including mothers with a history of spontaneous abortion who declined contraceptive use, healthcare providers and maternal and child care experts. Participants were selected using purposive sampling. Data were first analysed separately for each participant group and then triangulated to synthesise a comprehensive understanding of practices, challenges and opportunities. Results: Major barriers operate at policy, health system and individual levels, including the absence of a structured national preconception care programme, inadequate health system capacity, limited knowledge among women and providers, behavioural constraints to preconception care utilisation and a high prevalence of unplanned pregnancies. However, existing health extension programme, family planning clinic and gynaecology department with supportive policy frameworks offer viable entry points for integrating preconception IFAS. Conclusion: This study identified major gaps in the implementation of preconception IFAS within the Ethiopian healthcare system. Women with a history of spontaneous abortion who decline contraceptive use represent an overlooked group with unmet preconception nutritional needs. Strengthening policy, training and community awareness is essential. Future implementation research is needed to support integration of preconception IFAS and improve maternal and neonatal outcomes, contributing to Sustainable Development Goals for maternal and child health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.