ArticleGeriatric orthopaedic surgery & rehabilitation2026
Percutaneous Treatment of Geriatric Distal Tibia and Fibula Fractures With a Poor Soft Tissue Envelope - A Case Series.
Article in Geriatric orthopaedic surgery & rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Geriatric distal tibia and fibula fractures are typically treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) or prolonged cast immobilisation. These methods predispose to wound complications and delayed weight-bearing. Percutaneous fixation can offer a stable construct allowing for early weight-bearing while minimising wound complications. This case series details the management and outcomes of patients over 65 with distal tibia and fibula fractures and poor soft tissue envelope treated with percutaneous fixation. Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted at two Victorian orthopaedic units, identifying patients over 65 years of age who underwent percutaneous distal tibia or fibula fracture fixation. Patient selection considered soft tissue quality and overall health. Antegrade tibial intramedullary nails and retrograde percutaneous screws were used. Surgery proceeded without delay for swelling or anticoagulation cessation. Clinical notes and radiographs were analysed for premorbid health, mobility status, injury mechanism and classification, fixation methods, post-operative mobility, and treatment complications. Results: The study identified 13 ankles in 11 patients (average age 82) across two sites. Fractures included 4 trimalleolar, 5 bimalleolar, 1 lateral malleolar, and 3 distal tibia and fibula diaphyseal. Three fractures were open. Median time to operation was 3 days. Six patients were allowed immediate weight-bearing as tolerated. Median post-operative stay was 5 days. One deep infection required removal of a suture-button syndesmosis device and two minor wound breakdowns (distant to surgical site) were managed non-operatively with dressings. Conclusion: Percutaneous distal tibia and fibula fracture fixation appears to be a viable alternative to ORIF in geriatric patients with poor soft tissue envelope, potentially offering reduced complications and earlier mobilisation. Level of evidence: Level IV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.