ArticleTH open : companion journal to thrombosis and haemostasis2026
Antenatal Pulmonary Embolism Diagnostics in Pregnant Patients with SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Community Hospitals.
Article in TH open : companion journal to thrombosis and haemostasis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The diagnostic evaluation of pulmonary embolism (PE) in pregnancy is challenging, as the physiologic changes of pregnancy can mimic several PE symptoms. Acute respiratory infections introduce additional diagnostic complexity by producing systemic inflammation, altering vital signs, and, in some cases, elevating D-dimer levels. As a case in point, we examined how SARS-CoV-2 infection affected presentation, pretest probability, and diagnostic testing in pregnant patients with possible PE. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study across 21 community medical centers from October 1, 2021, to March 30, 2023. We included pregnant outpatients ≥ 18 years evaluated for suspected PE with D-dimer testing, compression ultrasonography, computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA), or lung scintigraphy. We compared patients with and without COVID-19 using bivariate analysis. Results: Among 860 patients, the median age was 30.0 years; 39.1% were in the third trimester. COVID-19 was present in 147 (17.1%). Compared with non-COVID-19 patients, those with COVID-19 more often had fever (36.1% vs. 4.2%), tachycardia ≥ 110 bpm (66.0% vs. 34.2%), and oxygen saturation < 95% (12.2% vs. 4.8%), but less often reported chest pain (49.7% vs. 65.5%; all Conclusion: COVID-19 in pregnancy was associated with worse vital signs, higher pretest probability, higher D-dimer values, and increased diagnostic testing. These findings illustrate how acute respiratory infections may recalibrate PE risk assessment in pregnancy and highlight the need to refine diagnostic strategies when infection-related physiologic changes are present.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.