ArticleFrontiers in plant science2026
Steady-state
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial lighting is a major cost in controlled-environment agriculture (CEA), motivating longer photoperiods at lower photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) to meet a target daily light integral (DLI). In tomato, static 24-h lighting can induce photoperiodic injury and reduced photosynthetic performance, often discussed as an end-product (triose-phosphate) limitation that constrains inorganic phosphate (Pi) recycling. Dynamic 24-h LED schedules that impose day-night spectral and intensity cues have been proposed to extend photoperiod without injury, but their effects on assimilation-export coupling remain unclear. We investigated whether early dysfunction under static 24-h light reflects a downstream sink-side export bottleneck that limits carbon export regardless of source (newly assimilated and mobilization of stored carbon), or a source-leaf limitation that selectively reduces concurrent export during assimilation while preserving export supported by mobilizing stored carbon, and whether dynamic schedules avoid these constraints. We used steady-state
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.