ArticleApplications in plant sciences
Detecting introgression from phylogenetic invariant site patterns using machine learning.
Article in Applications in plant sciences. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Detecting introgression from phylogenetic invariant site patterns using machine learning.Applications in plant sciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Premise: Detecting historical introgression among populations or species from genomic data is a common goal in evolutionary genetics. Most current methods fall into two major categories: network inference and admixture inference. Network inference (e.g., SNaQ) is computationally challenging and typically requires first reducing large genomic datasets into a less informative collection of inferred gene trees. In contrast, admixture inference (e.g., ABBA-BABA tests) can accommodate enormous single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) datasets but is restricted to examining subsets of four to five samples at a time. Here, we demonstrate a new approach to evaluate SNP frequencies among quartet samples under a phylogenetic hypothesis (similar to ABBA-BABA tests), while examining all quartet information simultaneously (similar to the network inference methods). Methods and Results: To do this, our method simcat trains a neural network machine learning model on coalescent simulations to discriminate between introgression scenarios based on learned SNP frequency patterns. We demonstrate the accuracy of simcat to classify introgression events from simulations, evaluate its sensitivity to variation in species tree parameters, and demonstrate its application to an empirical dataset of oak trees ( Conclusions: Our approach represents a first step towards leveraging machine learning to expand phylogenetic invariants-based methods beyond the scale of quartets to a larger phylogenetic context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.