ArticleInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2026
Association Between Improvement in Institutional COPD Quality Assessment Grade and Risk of Acute Exacerbations in Primary and Secondary Care: A Nationwide Claims-Based Study.
Article in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA) in South Korea assesses and grades primary and secondary healthcare institutions according to their management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This study examined whether changes in institutional quality assessment grades were associated with variations in the concurrent risk of acute COPD exacerbations. Methods: Using national HIRA claims data, we identified 36,218 patients with COPD treated at 873 non-tertiary medical institutions between May 2016 and April 2018. Institutions were stratified into three groups based on their grade trajectories from the 3rd (May 2016-April 2017) to the 4th (May 2017-April 2018) assessment periods: the 158 improved-grade (n=5,118), 526 maintained-grade (n=25,286), and 189 declined-grade (n=5,814) institution groups. We compared the incidence and severity of exacerbations among these groups during the 4th assessment period. Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) for exacerbations were estimated using multivariable negative binomial regression models to adjust for potential confounders. Results: At baseline, improved-grade institutions exhibited significantly higher rates of pulmonary function testing (56.3% vs. 41.9%) and greater prescription of long-acting muscarinic antagonists (29.0% vs. 14.6%) compared with declined-grade institutions (p<0.001). During the 1-year outcome period (May 2017-April 2018), the incidence of moderate-to-severe COPD exacerbations was considerably higher in the declined-grade group (29.2%) than in the improved-grade group (26.1%) (p=0.008). In the negative binomial regression analyses using the maintained-grade group as the reference category, patients treated at improved-grade institutions had a significantly lower risk of exacerbations (adjusted IRR 0.864, 95% CI 0.795-0.939, p<0.001). Conclusion: This analysis of nationwide real-world claims data demonstrated that institutional improvement in COPD quality assessment grades was associated with a reduced concurrent risk of acute exacerbations in both primary and secondary care settings. These findings indicate that institutional indicators of guideline-aligned COPD care may correspond to clinically meaningful differences in patient-level outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.