ArticleFrontiers in health services2026
Closing the implementation-evidence gap using data science: a transferable workflow applied to medical cost analysis.
Article in Frontiers in health services, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rising healthcare expenditure is a global challenge, particularly in ageing populations with increasing chronic disease burden. While many studies identify cost determinants, few provide a reproducible analytic workflow that is transferable across health systems. This study presents a data science-based analytic pipeline to model medical expenditure, demonstrated using a large, publicly available health expenditure dataset. The pipeline incorporates feature engineering, statistical and machine learning models, model comparison, and interpretability analysis. The primary contribution is methodological, emphasising transparency, reproducibility, and potential transferability rather than context-specific conclusions. Although implementation science frameworks inform the interpretation, they are used only as conceptual lenses, and no implementation strategies are evaluated. The findings are therefore intended as forward-looking considerations, illustrating how data-driven approaches may inform future policy design, stakeholder engagement, and technology-enabled strategies for preventive care and chronic disease management, subject to local adaptation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.