Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42343893›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in health services2026

Closing the implementation-evidence gap using data science: a transferable workflow applied to medical cost analysis.

Fengyi Gao, Siew-Pang Chan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in health services, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Fengyi GaoDepartment of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Siew-Pang ChanDepartment of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rising healthcare expenditure is a global challenge, particularly in ageing populations with increasing chronic disease burden. While many studies identify cost determinants, few provide a reproducible analytic workflow that is transferable across health systems. This study presents a data science-based analytic pipeline to model medical expenditure, demonstrated using a large, publicly available health expenditure dataset. The pipeline incorporates feature engineering, statistical and machine learning models, model comparison, and interpretability analysis. The primary contribution is methodological, emphasising transparency, reproducibility, and potential transferability rather than context-specific conclusions. Although implementation science frameworks inform the interpretation, they are used only as conceptual lenses, and no implementation strategies are evaluated. The findings are therefore intended as forward-looking considerations, illustrating how data-driven approaches may inform future policy design, stakeholder engagement, and technology-enabled strategies for preventive care and chronic disease management, subject to local adaptation.

Indexed as

behavioural medicineCFIRdata sciencemedical costssmart medicine

Identifiers

PMID42343893
PMCPMC13287034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.