Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42343888›Full record

ReviewACS energy letters2026

Journey toward a Global Understanding of Recombination in Halide Perovskites for Photovoltaic Applications.

Samuel D Stranks, Thomas Kirchartz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS energy letters, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Samuel D StranksDepartment of Chemical Engineering and Biotechnology, University of Cambridge, Philippa Fawcett Drive, Cambridge, CB3 0AS, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8303-7292
Thomas KirchartzIMD-3 Photovoltaics, Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425, Jülich, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6954-8213

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite rapid progress in halide perovskite solar cells, a comprehensive understanding of recombination processes and agreement about the most appropriate models to explain recombination and interpret experimental data are still lacking yet will be critical to further performance and stability improvements. Here, we analyze the evolution of recombination models in halide perovskites, highlighting how the background of many researchers in dye-sensitized and organic photovoltaics triggered an early emphasis on the inclusion of excitons followed by a phase of simplifying the mathematical description until experiment and theory were clearly becoming inconsistent with each other. Recent years have seen the trend of going back to the original models for classical semiconductors. These approaches are more frequently combined with sophisticated approaches for fitting and quantifying confidence in data analysis that make increasing use of machine learning algorithms. We outline the need for global recombination models and the challenges and opportunities in attaining this.

Identifiers

PMID42343888
PMCPMC13289842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.