Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42343709›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in oncology2026

Deep learning assisting the surgical management of gynecologic cancers.

Veronica Tius, Martina Arcieri, Stefano Restaino, Giuseppe Vizzielli

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Veronica TiusClinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, "S. Maria della Misericordia" University Hospital, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale (ASUFC).
Martina ArcieriClinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, "S. Maria della Misericordia" University Hospital, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale (ASUFC).
Stefano RestainoClinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, "S. Maria della Misericordia" University Hospital, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale (ASUFC).
Giuseppe VizzielliClinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, "S. Maria della Misericordia" University Hospital, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale (ASUFC).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis review examines the current role of deep learning in the surgical management of gynecologic cancers. It aims to evaluate applications across surgical training, intraoperative guidance, and outcome prediction, while identifying limitations that hinder translation into routine clinical practice. RECENT

findingsDeep learning-based systems show promising performance in enhancing surgical skills through objective assessment and simulation platforms. Intraoperatively, deep learning models can recognize anatomical structures, surgical phases, and tumor tissue, with high diagnostic accuracy in selected settings. Emerging techniques such as surgical optomics and hyperspectral imaging may further improve tumor detection. Additionally, predictive models integrating clinical, imaging, and intraoperative data demonstrate potential in estimating complications, resource utilization, and survival outcomes. However, most studies are retrospective, based on limited datasets, and lack external validation, with minimal evidence of real-world clinical impact. SUMMARY: Artificial intelligence, particularly deep learning algorithms, represents a rapidly evolving tool in gynecologic oncologic surgery, with potential to standardize and personalize care. Nevertheless, significant gaps remain between experimental performance and clinical implementation.

Indexed as

Deep LearningGenital Neoplasms, FemaleGynecologic Surgical ProceduresSurgery, Computer-AssistedFemaleHumansSoft Computingartificial intelligencedeep learninggynecologyoncologysurgery

Identifiers

PMID42343709
PMCPMC13566392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.