Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42343691›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2026

An Explainable AI Framework for Continuous Monitoring, Risk Stratification, and Clinical Decision Support in Primary Biliary Cholangitis: Protocol for a Multiphase Development and Validation Study.

Basile Njei, Ulrick Sidney Kanmounye

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Basile NjeiEngelhardt School of Global Health and Bioethics, Euclid University, Avenue de France, Campus ENAM, Bangui, BP 157, Central African Republic, +236 21 61 59 2.ORCID 0000-0003-0714-4368
Ulrick Sidney KanmounyeAssociation of Future African Neurosurgeons, Yaounde, Cameroon.ORCID 0000-0001-6791-1018

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) management remains limited by reliance on static biochemical markers, fragmented assessment of symptom burden, and inadequate noninvasive risk stratification for clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH). Existing tools fail to integrate longitudinal laboratory trends, elastography, and patient-reported outcomes, and translation of risk assessment into guideline-concordant clinical action remains inconsistent. Objective: This study aims to develop, validate, and pilot an explainable artificial intelligence (AI) framework-AIm-PBC-for continuous disease monitoring, early prediction of CSPH complications, and delivery of guideline-based clinical decision support in patients with PBC. Methods: We will conduct a multiphase study combining retrospective cohort analysis, prospective observational data collection, and implementation evaluation. At least 600 adults with confirmed PBC will be enrolled across academic hepatology centers. The AI framework will integrate longitudinal biochemical markers, noninvasive elastography metrics, and high-frequency patient-reported outcomes to generate an interpretable disease activity index and predict CSPH-related complications using gradient-boosted models with Shapley additive explanations. Outputs will be deployed via a SMART-on-FHIR (Substitutable Medical Applications, Reusable Technologies on Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources)-enabled electronic health record clinical decision support tool. Implementation will be evaluated using a randomized crossover simulation followed by a pragmatic pilot assessing usability, cognitive load, clinician adherence, and feasibility. Results: The primary outcomes include calibration and responsiveness of the disease activity index; discriminatory performance of the CSPH prediction model compared with established criteria; and effectiveness of the decision support tool measured via improvements in guideline-concordant care, usability scores, and clinician cognitive workload. Secondary outcomes include fairness metrics and workflow efficiency. Conclusions: This protocol outlines a scalable, explainable AI framework designed to bridge gaps between disease monitoring, risk prediction, and clinical action in PBC. If successful, AIm-PBC may enhance early complication detection, improve symptom management, and support equitable, evidence-based care delivery in routine hepatology practice.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDecision Support Systems, ClinicalLiver Cirrhosis, BiliaryHumansHypertension, PortalProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentValidation Studies as TopicAIartificial intelligenceclinical decision supportexplainable artificial intelligencepatient-reported outcomesportal hypertensionprimary biliary cholangitisrandomized controlled trials

Identifiers

PMID42343691
PMCPMC13294514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.