Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42343672›Full record

ArticlePublic health nutrition2026

Policy options to increase the provision of free school meals in England: a qualitative exploration of the challenges of policy implementation through stakeholder interviews.

Catrin Pedder Jones, Bisola Osifowora, Viktorija Kesaite, Irina Pokhilenko, Steven Cummins, Rachel Loopstra, Alexia Sawyer, Amy Yau, Martin White, Emma Frew and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Catrin Pedder JonesMRC Epidemiology Unit, School of Clinical Medicine, https://ror.org/013meh722University of Cambridge, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1425-0513
Bisola OsifoworaCentre for Economics of Obesity, Department of Applied Health Sciences, University of Birmingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-5703-2302
Viktorija Kesaite *MRC Epidemiology Unit, School of Clinical Medicine, https://ror.org/013meh722University of Cambridge, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0053-7583
Irina PokhilenkoCentre for Economics of Obesity, Department of Applied Health Sciences, University of Birmingham, UK.
Steven Cummins *Population Health Innovation Lab, Department of Public Health, Environments and Society, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, UK.
Rachel Loopstra *Department of Public Health, Policy and Systems, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Alexia Sawyer *MRC Epidemiology Unit, School of Clinical Medicine, https://ror.org/013meh722University of Cambridge, UK.
Amy Yau *Population Health Innovation Lab, Department of Public Health, Environments and Society, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8889-523X
Martin White *MRC Epidemiology Unit, School of Clinical Medicine, https://ror.org/013meh722University of Cambridge, UK.
Emma Frew *Centre for Economics of Obesity, Department of Applied Health Sciences, University of Birmingham, UK.
Mandala Consortium

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveRising levels of household food insecurity in England, and associated health and well-being impacts for children, have led to calls to expand access to free school meals (FSM). Policymakers have been hesitant to extend provision of FSM due to concerns surrounding acceptability, affordability and implementation challenges. The most effective strategies for expanding FSM are not yet fully understood. This work aims to fill this gap by examining school meal policy from the perspective of multiple stakeholders, to provide actionable recommendations for policies that could expand school meal provision.

designA qualitative interview study design was used. The data were analysed using the Framework Method, underpinned by the Context and Implementation of Complex Interventions (CICI) framework. Themes were categorised into context-related and implementation-related factors. Detailed recommendations were discussed at the macro, meso and micro levels of the school food system.

settingThe study was conducted in England, UK.

participantsSeventeen stakeholders represented the views of local, regional and national government, policy, academia and schools.

resultsStakeholders indicated that policies should prioritise stigma reduction and integrate expansion of school meals with existing school policies where possible, including the monitoring of school food standards and ensuring maintenance of school food quality. Stakeholders also suggested improvement to the administrative process and communication with families and recommended a joined-up approach linking interventions with common goals across the whole food system.

conclusionsCrucially, sufficient financial support is essential for successful implementation.

Indexed as

Food ServicesFood SupplyNutrition PolicySchoolsChildEnglandFood InsecurityHumansInterviews as TopicMealsQualitative ResearchStakeholder Participationfood insecuritypolicy implementationSchool mealsschool meals policy

Identifiers

PMID42343672
PMCPMC13434569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.