Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42343617›Full record

SynthesisThe Journal of international medical research2026

Timing of surgical excision for burn wounds: A systematic evaluation and meta-analysis comparing early and delayed excision.

Hui Wang, Da Wang, Yue Wu, Jun Liu

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic ReviewComparative Study
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Journal of international medical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hui WangFirst Ward of the Department of Burn, Gansu Provincial Hospital, China.
Da WangFirst Ward of the Department of Burn, Gansu Provincial Hospital, China.
Yue WuFirst Ward of the Department of Burn, Gansu Provincial Hospital, China.
Jun LiuFirst Ward of the Department of Burn, Gansu Provincial Hospital, China.ORCID 0009-0005-0339-9998

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BackgroundThe optimal timing of burn wound excision remains controversial. We updated the evidence base by synthesizing data from comparative studies published from 1 January 2010 to 11 March 2024 that compared the outcomes of early and delayed excision in patients with thermal burns.MethodsThe PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science Core Collection databases were searched. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed. Mortality was pooled as risk difference, and continuous outcomes were pooled as standardized mean differences with 95% confidence intervals. Prespecified subgroup analyses considered study design, country income group, and the operational definition of early excision. This systematic review and meta-analysis was formally registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) on 3 December 2024 (CRD42024621585).ResultsTen comparative studies (8 observational studies and two randomized controlled trials) involving 5070 patients fulfilled the eligibility criteria. Early excision was not associated with lower mortality than delayed excision (5 studies; risk difference: -0.01, 95% confidence interval: -0.06 to 0.03;

Indexed as

BurnsHumansLength of StayTime FactorsTreatment DelayTreatment OutcomeburnsBurn wound excisiondelayed excisionmeta-analysistiming of surgery

Identifiers

PMID42343617
PMCPMC13309668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.