SynthesisActa dermato-venereologica2026
Recurrent Cutaneous Eosinophilic Vasculitis: A Systematic Review of Clinicopathologic Features and Treatment Outcomes.
Synthesis in Acta dermato-venereologica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recurrent cutaneous eosinophilic vasculitis is a rare, predominantly cutaneous vasculitis described mainly in isolated reports. We aimed to systematically synthesize published evidence on its clinico-pathological features, treatment and outcomes. We reviewed case reports and case series of recurrent cutaneous eosinophilic vasculitis and related entities identified in PubMed, Scopus and reference lists (last searched 16 February 2026), using structured report and case-level extraction, duplicate handling, Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal and descriptive synthesis. Twenty reports comprising 24 unique cases were included. Most patients presented with relapsing pruritic purpura of the lower extremities. Peripheral eosinophilia was frequent, antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies were negative in all reported cases and histopathology consistently showed eosinophil-rich vasculitis, usually with fibrinoid and/or necrotizing change. Systemic corticosteroids often induced improvement, but relapse during tapering or after withdrawal was common. The evidence was limited by small, heterogeneous reports and incomplete follow-up. Overall, the findings support a recognizable cutaneous-predominant, relapse-prone pattern, highlight the importance of assessing extracutaneous involvement in differential diagnosis and support provisional refinement of the previously proposed diagnostic framework.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.