ArticleMicrobiome2026
Temporal dynamics of rhizosphere microbiome assembly and carbon-phosphorus coupling in poplar-medicinal plant intercropping systems.
Article in Microbiome, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIntercropping can reshape the rhizosphere microbiome, but how specific companion plants influence nutrient cycling and host growth remains unclear. We proposed that intercropping poplar with medicinal plants creates distinct rhizosphere niches that select for microbial communities with distinct functional potential, thereby improving tree nutrition.
resultsIntercropping significantly promoted poplar growth, with increases in diameter at breast height (DBH) of 15.33%, 14.3%, and 15.23% in systems with Anemarrhena asphodeloides, Belamcanda chinensis, and Saposhnikovia divaricata, respectively. Intercropping did not change microbial alpha diversity but led to plant-specific shifts in beta diversity with clear seasonal dynamics. Metagenomic analyses revealed corresponding shifts in the functional potential of microbial communities related to carbon (C) and phosphorus (P) cycling, including genes such as frdC, aldB, ppk2, and phnH. Intercropping, particularly with S. divaricata, was associated with an increased genetic potential for microbial C metabolism and a heightened potential for P solubilization. These co-occurring shifts in genetic potential were correlated with greater P accumulation in poplar leaves. Network analysis showed distinct temporal microbial co-occurrence patterns across intercropping treatments, with A. asphodeloides supporting the most interconnected community linked to P mobilization. Three bacterial genera (Priestia, Pseudomonas, Acinetobacter) were strongly associated with key soil nutrient pools. Re-inoculation experiments confirmed their functional roles: Priestia sp. increased N and P retention in the rhizosphere; Pseudomonas sp. promoted plant growth, suggesting a role in stimulating plant secondary metabolism; and Acinetobacter sp. enhanced organic C mineralization.
conclusionsIntercropping with specific medicinal plants structures the rhizosphere microbiome through niche differentiation. This restructuring leads to distinct patterns of microbial functional potential, centered on C and P metabolism, which correlate with improved poplar nutrient acquisition and growth. Our findings, integrating metagenomic inference with experimental validation, provide a framework for selecting companion plants to steer the rhizosphere microbiome toward beneficial functional outcomes in agroforestry systems. Video Abstract.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.