ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2026
Implementation of a medical genomics program for rare diseases in Uruguay.
Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRare diseases (RDs) affect an estimated 7% of the global population and comprise ~7,000 heterogeneous conditions, most of which have a genetic etiology. Despite their collective burden, RDs pose major diagnostic challenges, often resulting in prolonged diagnostic odysseys with substantial clinical, emotional, and economic consequences. Next generation sequencing technologies such as whole exome (WES) and whole genome sequencing (WGS) have transformed RD diagnostics in high-resource settings. In contrast, the use of such technologies in Latin America remains uneven due to structural, regulatory, and economic constraints. In addition, the underrepresentation of admixed populations in genomic databases further complicates variant interpretation, reducing the diagnostic yield. In this context, we created the first genomic medicine program for rare diseases in Uruguay to address these challenges by implementing next-generation sequencing (NGS) strategies for diagnosis. MATERIAL AND
methodsWhole exome sequencing (WES) and whole genome sequencing (WGS) were performed on a cohort of 203 patients with suspected RD belonging to the Uruguayan public healthcare system. Variant prioritization was conducted using established bioinformatics pipelines integrating population frequency filtering, inheritance models, functional impact, and phenotype-driven clinical interpretation. Implementation of population-aware variant interpretation strategies was critical in this admixed population, helping to reduce false-positive findings arising from the underrepresentation of Latin American populations in global reference databases. This framework was built through sustained collaboration between academic institutions and healthcare providers, with a strong emphasis on local capacity building in clinical genetics, molecular diagnostics, and bioinformatics.
resultsTo date, we have analyzed a total of 203 patients: 172 using WES, 29 using WGS, and 11 using mitochondrial DNA sequencing (9 of whom were also analyzed by WES). The overall diagnostic yield was 48% for WES and 31% for WGS. The program significantly shortened diagnostic trajectories and enabled actionable clinical insights in a substantial proportion of cases.
conclusionsOur experience shows that comprehensive genomic diagnostics for RDs can be successfully carried out in emerging genomic medicine settings through integrated workflows and sustained investment in human capital. This initiative represents a scalable model for other low income countries seeking to incorporate genomic medicine into public healthcare systems and highlights the importance of regional genomic data to improve diagnostic accuracy and equity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.