ArticleCritical care (London, England)2026
On the inevitability of microvascular failure in septic shock and other vasodilatory conditions.
Article in Critical care (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Beyond shear stress: septic microvascular failure remains a multifactorial phenomenon.Critical care (London, England) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microcirculatory dysfunction is a defining feature of septic shock and is strongly associated with mortality, yet its relationship to macrocirculatory haemodynamics remains poorly understood. In particular, the persistence of heterogeneous capillary perfusion despite restoration of blood pressure and cardiac output (termed haemodynamic incoherence) lacks a coherent mechanistic explanation. I developed a conceptual and computational model of the microcirculation in which network behaviour is constrained by three interacting variables: cardiac output, vasomotor state, and shear stress regulation. A network of one million parallel arterioles was simulated using physiologically plausible distributions of vessel radius. For each vessel, flow requirements were determined by an apparent shear target, reflecting endothelial sensing of shear rather than absolute physical values. Total cardiac output required to maintain network-wide shear was calculated as the sum of individual vessel demands. The model demonstrates that, for a given shear target, total flow requirements increase in proportion to the sum of vessel radii cubed, such that even modest global vasodilation produces a substantial increase in required cardiac output. Increasing the apparent shear target further amplifies this demand. When cardiac output is insufficient to meet these requirements, vessels experience low shear and undergo functional derecruitment, reducing total flow demand but resulting in marked heterogeneity and reduced functional capillary density. These behaviours reproduce key features of septic physiology, including the hyperdynamic circulation and microvascular shunting observed in severe sepsis. The model provides a unifying framework in which microcirculatory dysfunction emerges as an inevitable consequence of the interaction between vasodilation, flow limitation, and shear regulation, rather than as an independent pathological process. It further predicts that therapies which reduce global vasodilation or lower the apparent shear target may restore microvascular coherence without requiring supranormal cardiac output. This framework generates testable hypotheses and offers a physiologically grounded basis for reinterpreting haemodynamic management in septic shock.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.