SynthesisBMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation2026
Effect of force-velocity profile-based individualized vs. non-individualized strength training on force-velocity profiles and athletic performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeWe aimed to conduct a systematic review with meta-analysis of the effects of force-velocity (FV) profile-based individualized strength training vs. non-individualized strength training on mechanical variables of FV profile and athletic performance.
methodsA computerized systematic literature search was performed in three electronic databases. Studies were included if they analyzed effects of FV profile-based individualized strength training on the metrics of FV measures (theoretical maximal force (F
resultsOverall, 6 studies were eligible to be included in this meta-analysis. Individualized FV strength training lasted between 7 and 10 weeks, with 2 weekly sessions and 8-28 sets per week. Strength training intensities ranged between 70 and 85% of the one-repetition maximum (1-RM) x 3-10 repetitions resistance training (training load ratio range: 70-100% : 30 - 0%) and velocity-oriented training involved 0-60% body mass x 3-10 repetitions plyometric training (training load ratio range: 70-100% : 30 - 0%). The meta-analysis showed significant and large differences between both training conditions for F
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.