ArticleBMC medical education2026
Bridging the gap: student and staff views on teaching, learning, and assessment in dental education.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundContemporary dental education increasingly emphasizes competency-based learning, student engagement, and alignment between teaching, learning, and assessment strategies. Understanding the perceptions of both students and academic staff may support curriculum development and improvement of educational quality. This study explored key components of the educational environment at the Faculty of Dental Medicine, Medical University - Sofia, Bulgaria.
methodsA cross-sectional questionnaire-based study was conducted during the 2024/2025 academic year among Bulgarian students, international students, and academic staff. Two tailored questionnaires assessed self-reported lecture attendance, motivation and engagement, individualized support, practical skills development, and perceptions regarding alignment between course objectives and assessment methods. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Pearson's chi-square test (χ²), Fisher's Exact test where appropriate, and Cronbach's alpha coefficient for internal consistency reliability.
resultsA total of 576 participants completed the survey, including 397 Bulgarian students, 122 international students, and 57 academic staff members. Approximately half of the students reported attending all lectures, while attendance related primarily to dental disciplines was more common among international students. Students most frequently reported attending lectures because they supported examination preparation and facilitated understanding of the material, whereas academic staff emphasized structured presentation and classroom discussions. More than half of the students reported not receiving an individualized educational approach, in contrast to academic staff perceptions. Bulgarian students more frequently preferred oral examinations, while international students demonstrated greater preference for practical and test-based assessments. Academic staff predominantly favored test-based examinations. Overall perceptions regarding alignment between examinations and course material were moderate to high across all respondent groups.
conclusionsDifferences between student and academic staff perceptions highlight opportunities to improve communication, individualized support, and assessment strategies within multilingual dental education. The findings may support curriculum development and quality assurance processes in competency-based dental education. Further multi-institutional studies and additional validation of the survey instruments are recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.