ArticleBMC oral health2026
Assessment of the knowledge and awareness among general medical practitioners toward dental intervention in diagnosing and treating obstructive sleep apnea: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundObstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA), one of the most common sleep disorders, is associated with a large amount of morbidity to both the heart and metabolic function. Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) remains the gold standard treatment for patients with OSA. In contrast, Dental treatments such as Mandibular Advancement Devices (MADs) are considered well-established alternatives for certain patients. Since General Practitioners (GPs) often initiate the diagnostic and therapeutic management of these patients, the extent of their understanding of dental and craniofacial management options remains unclear. MATERIALS AND
methodsAn electronic cross-sectional survey was conducted among licensed Medical Practitioners from both the Allopathic and AYUSH (Ayurveda, Yoga & Naturopathy, Unani, Siddha, Sowa-Rigpa, and Homeopathy) streams. A 15-question questionnaire was used to assess four domains: (1) Aetiology, (2) Diagnosis, (3) Treatment, and (4) Referral Practices. Responses ("Agree," "Disagree," "Not aware") were recorded and converted to a binary system for analysis, where Agree equals 1 and Disagree/Not aware equals 0. Descriptive statistics and Chi-square tests will help analyse the variation between domains at a statistically significant level (p < 0.05).
resultsDiagnostic awareness was moderate, with 57.6% identifying polysomnography (PSG) as the gold standard test. There was a deficiency in knowledge on the available treatment options: only half of them recognized MADs as efficient. The composite scoring provided a moderate knowledge score (6.72 ± 3.08) and significantly lower mean awareness score (1.79 ± 0.73). There was great heterogeneity between domains (χ2 = 127.31, df = 36, p = 0.0001) as familiarity with dental and craniofacial and referral-related aspects of OSA care was inconsistent.
conclusionGPs showed a greater level of awareness of general diagnostic concepts compared to craniofacial risk factors, oral appliance therapy, or interdisciplinary referral pathways. Specific educational programs and organized medical-dental partnership models should be established in order to enhance integrated management of OSA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.