ArticleBMC nursing2026
Non-pharmacological ICU nursing interventions and melatonin concentrations: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Article in BMC nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSleep disruption and circadian dysregulation are common in patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) and are associated with adverse recovery outcomes. Non-pharmacological nursing strategies such as environmental control and clustered care are widely implemented to reduce nocturnal disturbance, yet their physiological effects remain uncertain. Melatonin may serve as a potential marker of circadian processes; however, its interpretation depends on temporal dynamics that are not consistently captured across studies.
methodsThis systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials evaluated the effects of non-pharmacological ICU nursing interventions on melatonin concentrations, with secondary analyses of cortisol levels and sleep quality. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to February 7, 2026. Random-effects meta-analysis using Hedges' g was performed. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2.0 tool and certainty of evidence using GRADE. The review was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD420261303901) in February 2026.
resultsFive randomized trials were included. Non-pharmacological nursing interventions were associated with higher measured melatonin concentrations compared with usual care (Hedges' g = 0.28, 95% CI 0.08-0.49, p = 0.01; I² = 5.4%). However, in the absence of temporal profiling, this finding cannot be interpreted as evidence of circadian alignment. Cortisol outcomes showed no significant difference (Hedges' g = - 0.11, 95% CI - 0.83-0.61, p = 0.76; I² = 86.8%). Sleep quality outcomes were inconclusive, with substantial heterogeneity across studies (Hedges' g = 1.22, 95% CI - 0.05-2.48, p = 0.06; I² = 94.3%). Certainty of evidence was low for melatonin and very low for other outcomes due to risk of bias, imprecision, and inconsistency.
conclusionsNon-pharmacological ICU nursing care was associated with modest increases in melatonin concentrations; however, the clinical significance of this finding remains uncertain, and no consistent benefits were observed for perceived sleep quality or cortisol concentrations. These findings suggest that such interventions may be associated with higher nocturnal melatonin concentrations, although their effects on patient-centered clinical outcomes remain unclear. Further large, well-designed trials are required to confirm these findings. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: Registered in PROSPERO (CRD420261303901).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.