ArticleWorld journal of surgical oncology2026
Evaluating the prognostic significance of lymph node yield in resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a population-based study.
Article in World journal of surgical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSurgical resection plays a pivotal role in the management of pancreatic cancer by achieving complete tumor removal and regional lymphadenectomy. Although most clinical guidelines recommend examining at least 15 lymph nodes for accurate staging and better prognostic assessment, the optimal threshold remains uncertain and requires validation across population-based datasets.
methodsUsing the Taiwan Cancer Registry and National Health Insurance Research Database, 885 patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma who underwent curative resection between 2013 and 2019 were identified. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to evaluate the association between lymph node yield (LNY ≥ 15 vs. <15) and overall survival (OS), adjusting for potential confounders. Several sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the robustness of the findings, including a subgroup analysis restricted to patients with pT1-3 pancreatic head tumors who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy. Stratified analyses were additionally performed according to pathological T and N classifications and treatment modalities.
resultsThe median LNY was 15, with 474 patients (53.6%) having ≥ 15 nodes retrieved. Patients with adequate LNY were more likely to have tumors located in the pancreatic head, undergo pancreatoduodenectomy, and present with more advanced pT and pN stages as well as a higher number of positive nodes. No significant difference in 1- or 3-year overall survival (OS) was observed between patients with LNY ≥ 15 and those with LNY < 15 in the overall cohort. In the predefined subgroup of patients with pT1-3 pancreatic head tumors undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy, however, retrieval of ≥ 15 lymph nodes was associated with significantly improved 1- and 3-year OS compared with retrieval of < 15 lymph nodes. After adjustment for confounders, LNY ≥ 15 remained associated with improved 1- and 3-year OS in this subgroup, whereas no such association was observed in the overall cohort. Stratified analyses by pathological stage and treatment demonstrated generally consistent findings, with the most pronounced survival benefit of LNY ≥ 15 observed among patients with pT1-2 disease.
conclusionsRetrieval of ≥ 15 lymph nodes were not directly associated with improved survival in the overall cohort but was associated with better survival among patients with pT1-3 pancreatic head tumors undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy. These findings suggest that the prognostic value of the conventional 15-node threshold may vary across clinical subgroups and warrants further validation in larger population-based studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.