ArticleJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2026
Quantitative assessment of the 30-second sit-to-stand test using computer vision technology for physical therapists.
Article in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFalls are a leading cause of disability and mortality in older adults. The 30-second sit-to-stand test (30STS) traditionally relies on repetition counts, limiting its ability to capture subtle postural control deficits. We applied computer vision and machine learning to extend this test into a multidimensional assessment framework for functional status discrimination.
methodsThirty-two community-dwelling older adults (18 normal, 14 weak) performed two 30STS tests at baseline (June-July 2022) and follow-up (January-February 2023). Smartphone videos were processed using Keypoint R-CNN to extract 17 joint coordinates. Center of mass (CoM), kinematic parameters, and multiscale sample entropy (MSE) were derived. Paired t-tests assessed within-group changes; logistic regression, random forests, and support vector machines (SVM) evaluated classification using repeated stratified five-fold cross-validation.
resultsCoM extremal and shape metrics (maximum, minimum, skewness, kurtosis) were more sensitive than mean values, revealing transient instability and compensatory strategies in weak participants (p < 0.05). Kinematic analysis showed consistent control in normal participants, whereas weak participants adopted conservative amplitude-reducing strategies (e.g., acc-y CV, p = 0.022). MSE values suggested increased horizontal temporal complexity in the normal group, whereas reduced complexity was observed in the weak group, which may reflect altered movement coordination patterns. Random forests achieved the highest cross-validated performance within this cohort (AUC = 0.993); logistic regression was consistently strong (AUC ≈ 0.93, CA ≈ 0.90); SVM improved to high accuracy (AUC = 0.961, CA = 0.886).
conclusionsSmartphone-based pose estimation expanded the 30STS from a repetition count to a multidimensional assessment, providing additional quantitative information beyond repetition count. This approach shows promise for longitudinal monitoring, community screening, and remote care, with machine learning models demonstrating preliminary feasibility within this cohort.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.