ArticleBMC public health2026
Fertility intentions among medical students in war-torn Ukraine: a cross-sectional survey.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUkraine's total fertility rate was 0.9 in 2022, among the lowest in Europe. Amid the ongoing full-scale invasion, understanding reproductive intentions is important for informing future pronatalist policies. This study assessed fertility intentions and attitudes toward parenthood, with a focus on sex differences, and subjective determinants of reproductive decision-making among undergraduate medical students in wartime Ukraine.
methodsA cross-sectional, confidential, online survey was conducted among students at Odesa National Medical University in May 2024. The Swedish Fertility Awareness Questionnaire was used, supplemented with a question on contraceptive use. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, univariable, multivariable and stepwise logistic regression.
resultsThe mean age was 20 years among the participants: 655 women and 191 men. Overall, 75% intended to have children, with a preferred family size of two children. Women preferred to have their first child at a younger age than men (26.1 vs. 28.1 years; p < 0.001). No sex differences were observed in the perceived importance of having children. Oral and long-acting reversible contraceptive use was relatively low. Furthermore 62% of participants indicated that they would support a hypothetical pregnancy to birth, mainly for moral or religious reasons. Among those opting for abortion, the most commonly cited reasons were financial constraints and war-related concerns. In the case of infertility, more women than men were willing to consider IVF or adoption (p < 0.001). Key prerequisites for parenthood included adequate housing (93%) and financial stability (92%). Women were more likely to anticipate emotional benefits of parenthood (OR 1.66), whereas men were more likely to anticipate negative impacts on personal time (OR 1.91) and finances (OR 1.72). Intention to have children was associated with psychological readiness, emotional fulfilment, life priorities, and perceived housing adequacy (aOR 3.02), as a key independent predictor of overall readiness for parenthood.
conclusionsDespite the ongoing war, fertility intentions among medical students remain relatively optimistic, equally for women and men. As adequate housing was an important prerequisite for parenthood, post-war pronatalist policies may benefit from integrating housing support into broader family well-being strategies, while also addressing sexuality education and cultural influences on family formation and parenthood decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.