ArticleBMC public health2026
Access to WASH facilities and health implications of period poverty among in-school girls in rural areas of Africa: a scoping review.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMenstrual health is essential to adolescent well-being, yet many girls experience period poverty, an inadequate access to sanitary products, water, sanitation facilities, and menstrual education. This scoping review synthesised existing evidence on access to menstrual products, commonly described barriers and reported associations between poor health and period poverty among in-school girls in rural areas of Africa.
methodsThis study was developed in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute recommendations and reported using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews checklist. PubMed, Web of Science and Google Scholar were searched for literature published in English, between 2015 and 2025. The literature must meet the inclusion criterion of being conducted among in-school girls in rural communities in Africa. Extracted data were summarised in an Excel spreadsheet, and descriptive analyses were conducted.
resultsTwenty-one (21) relevant studies were identified, of which 14 were quantitative, four were qualitative, and three were mixed methods studies. The studies were conducted across six countries, with the largest proportion from Kenya (5/21; 23%). Many of the girls were between 10 and 19 years. Period poverty was common among in-school menstruating girls in rural areas of Africa, and it negatively influenced their physical, mental, social and sexual health. Period poverty was linked to body odour, body burns, headaches, fatigue, urogenital symptoms, experience of fear, discomfort, shame, and stress. It can also lead to vulnerability to sexual exploitation, disrupted schooling, poor academic performance and school dropout.
conclusionsPeriod poverty was widespread among in-school girls in rural Africa and linked to negative implications on their health. Integrated interventions that reduce girls' vulnerability to stigma and sexual exploitation, such as free or subsidised menstrual products, gender-responsive water, sanitation and hygiene facilities, and menstrual education for boys and girls, are urgently required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.