ArticleBMC medical education2026
Impact of the micro-research model on building research capacity in undergraduate health professions students in HIV-related research: a comprehensive evaluation using the RE-AIM framework.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLow-income settings such as Uganda bear a disproportionately high burden of diseases such as HIV/AIDS, but contribute little to knowledge production to address their health challenges. The training of health professionals traditionally focuses on clinical skills with less emphasis on research; yet, in practice, health professionals are expected to do operational research. In this study, we evaluate the impact of a micro-research model on building the capacity of undergraduate health professions students to conduct locally relevant biomedical, behavioral, clinical, and operations research on HIV and its co-morbidities.
methodsThis study was within the Health Professional Education Partnership Initiative - Transforming Ugandan Institutions Training Against HIV/AIDS (HEPI-TUITAH; 2018-2024), using a sequential explanatory mixed methods design. We collected quantitative data on sociodemographic, number of trainings, concepts and written manuscripts. Thereafter, we conducted in-depth interviews and analyzed them using a thematic content approach. We used the RE-AIM (reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance) framework to evaluate the impact (number trainings, protocols written, manuscripts written, publications, and change in attitudes) of the HEPI-TUITAH micro-research model.
resultsOf the 24 participants that were interviewed, 15 (62.5%) were male, aged 24-63 years (mean age, 35.3 years). Despite the challenges associated with the COVID-19 risk management measures, 41 (57%) out of the expected 72 manuscripts were published. Most participants expressed satisfaction with the recruitment process and the opportunities provided by the program. The process was described as transparent, competitive, and inclusive, allowing participation of multiple disciplines within the health professions training domains. The multi-disciplinary approach to team formation enriched the research process by leveraging diverse perspectives and expertise. Our data show that effective mentorship was a key driver of program success, facilitating skill development, fostering strong relationships, and ultimately contributing to the advancement of both mentees and mentors in their academic and professional pursuits. Training and mentorship sessions encompassed proposal development and manuscript writing. There was a general positive outlook regarding the sustainability at participating institutions.
conclusionThe micro-research model is a successful model for building research capacity for undergraduate health professions students. This model is highly recommended for integration into curricula for health professions programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.