ArticleBMC medical education2026
Study motivations and perceived academic and career returns among international students in clinical medicine education in China: an interview study.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChina has become a major destination for international medical students, supported in part by English-taught Bachelor of Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery (MBBS) programmes. Existing research has tended to examine study motivations and learning outcomes separately, providing limited insight into how motivations are formed and how perceptions of academic and career returns evolve over the extended course of medical training. This study examines the formation of international MBBS students' motivations to study clinical medicine in China and explores changes in their perceptions of academic and career returns over time.
methodsA qualitative design was employed. Semi-structured interviews were conducted between June and November 2025 with 17 international medical students enrolled in MBBS programmes at two public universities in China. Participants were purposively sampled across different years of study and were mainly from Asian and African countries. Interviews were conducted in English or Chinese, audio-recorded, and transcribed verbatim. Data were analysed using thematic analysis supported by NVivo 12 software. The analysis was guided by push-pull theory, expectancy-value theory, and professional identity theory, with rigor enhanced through member checking and peer review.
resultsTwo overarching themes, four subthemes, and fifteen specific categories emerged. Students' motivations reflected push factors in their home countries, including limited access to medical education, high costs, and perceived shortcomings in training quality, alongside pull factors related to China, such as curriculum structure, affordability, degree recognition, safety, and exposure to a high volume of clinical cases. Perceptions of academic and career returns changed over time. Some students perceived higher-than-expected academic and career returns, reflected in shifts in learning approaches, increased professional confidence, and stronger identification with the doctor role. Others perceived expected or lower-than-expected academic and career returns, mainly associated with limited hands-on clinical experience, language-related communication challenges, and uncertainty regarding future career pathways.
conclusionsMotivations to study clinical medicine in China were not static, and perceptions of academic and career returns evolved throughout training. Greater attention to students' learning trajectories, including opportunities for clinical participation, language support, and career guidance, may enhance learning experiences and contribute to longer-term professional development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.