ArticleBMC cancer2026
Machine learning-powered audio-omics processing method as an auxiliary diagnostic approach for advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Article in BMC cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeNasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is located in the nasopharyngeal mucosa and is a malignant tumour of the head and neck, and approximately 70% of patients have intermediate to advanced disease at the time of initial diagnosis. Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is closely correlated with etiology and pathogenesis of NPC, serological detection of EBV antibodies is a common screening method for NPC. However, only approximately 60% of NPC cases are associated with EBV infection. Herein, this work aimed to develop and internally evaluate a machine learning-based acoustic signal processing model as a preliminary non-invasive auxiliary diagnostic approach for advanced NPC. MATERIALS AND
methodsFirst, we collected the audio files from 359 advanced NPC patients and 304 healthy controls in our hospital from 2022 to 2025. The machine learning-powered Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Screening (ML-NPCS) system for screening NPC. And the ML-NPCS system is composed of three steps: speech acquisition, acoustic features extraction, and classification decision-making.
resultsIn the independent test set, ML-NPCS achieved an accuracy of 84.2% (95% CI, 77.1%-89.4%), a sensitivity of 88.9% (95% CI, 79.6%-94.3%), and a specificity of 78.7% (95% CI, 66.9%-87.1%); the independent test set comprised 133 participants (72 patients with advanced NPC and 61 healthy controls).
conclusionThe ML-NPCS model demonstrated preliminary potential for distinguishing advanced NPC patients from healthy controls using voice-derived acoustic features. Further prospective evaluation in early-stage disease, symptomatic controls, and external cohorts is required before population-level screening use can be considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.