Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42343236›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2026

Integrative analysis of yield and physiological responses of wheat genotypes under drought and heat stress across diverse environments.

H M Mamrutha, Gopalareddy Krishnappa, Rinki Khobra, Yogesh Kumar, Vinayaka, Amaresh, T Lakshmi Pathy, Vanita Pandey, Suma Biradar, Chandra Kant Singh and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

H M MamruthaICAR-Indian Institute of Wheat and Barley Research, Karnal, 132001, India. mamruthamadhu@gmail.com.
Gopalareddy KrishnappaICAR-National Institute of Seed Science & Technology, Mau Regional Station, Bengaluru, 560065, India. gopalgpb@gmail.com.
Rinki KhobraICAR-Indian Institute of Wheat and Barley Research, Karnal, 132001, India.
Yogesh KumarICAR-Indian Institute of Wheat and Barley Research, Karnal, 132001, India.
VinayakaICAR-Sugarcane Breeding Institute, Coimbatore, 641007, India.
AmareshICAR-Sugarcane Breeding Institute, Coimbatore, 641007, India.
T Lakshmi PathyICAR-Sugarcane Breeding Institute, Coimbatore, 641007, India.
Vanita PandeyICAR-Indian Institute of Wheat and Barley Research, Karnal, 132001, India.
Suma BiradarAICRP on Wheat MARS, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad, 580005, India.
Chandra Kant SinghICAR-Directorate of Weed Research, Maharajpur, Jabalpur, 482004, India.
K J YashavanthakumarAgharkar Research Institute, GG Agarkar Road, Pune, 411 004, India.
Jang Bahadur SinghICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, Regional Station, Indore, 452 001, India.
Deepak Kumar BaranwalBihar Agricultural University, Sabour, Bhagalpur, 813210, India.
Renu MunjalCCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, 125004, India.
Satish Kumar SinghDr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University, Samastipur, Pusa, 848125, India.
Hanif KhanICAR-Indian Institute of Wheat and Barley Research, Karnal, 132001, India.
O P AhlawatICAR-Indian Institute of Wheat and Barley Research, Karnal, 132001, India.
Ratan TiwariICAR-Indian Institute of Wheat and Barley Research, Karnal, 132001, India.

Funding

Indian Council of Agricultural Research CRSCIIWBRCL20200010194
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDrought and heat stress increasingly threaten global wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) production, posing major challenges to food security and sustainable agriculture. Identifying genotypes that combine high yield potential with physiological resilience across diverse environments is essential for developing climate-smart wheat cultivars. The objective of this study was to identify high-yielding and physiologically resilient wheat genotypes with stable performance across diverse environments under drought and heat stress using multivariate and multi-trait analytical approaches.

methodsForty-nine wheat genotypes comprising 43 promising breeding lines (G1-G43) and six released checks (G44-G49) were evaluated across eight locations representing distinct mega-environments during the 2022-23 Rabi season. Trials were conducted under normal (N), drought (D), and late-sown heat (H) conditions. Grain yield, biomass, and key physiological traits were analyzed using multivariate approaches and multi-trait indices to assess genotype performance, stability, and adaptability under drought and heat stress conditions.

resultsHighly significant (p ≤ 0.001) effects of genotype, environment, and genotype × environment (G×E) interaction were observed for all traits. Mean grain yield declined from 6.5 t ha⁻¹ under normal conditions to 4.5 t ha⁻¹ (-31%) under drought and 5.0 t ha⁻¹ (-23%) under heat stress. Genotypes G7 (6.23 t ha⁻¹), G13 (6.15 t ha⁻¹), G8 (5.93 t ha⁻¹), G9 (5.92 t ha⁻¹), G4 (5.91 t ha⁻¹), and G36 (5.88 t ha⁻¹) outperformed the best check G47 (5.80 t ha⁻¹) by 1.5-7.2%. Biomass ranged from 17.2 to 17.5 t ha⁻¹ under normal conditions, with reductions of 17-30% under stress. Physiological traits showed declines of 11-28% in Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) and 8-12% in chlorophyll content, along with increases of 14-23% in canopy temperature. Genotype-specific advantages included higher chlorophyll content and grain number in G13, superior biomass and kernel weight in G7 and G8, and lower canopy temperature in G9. Multi-trait indices consistently ranked these genotypes among the most stable across environments. The Genotype + Genotype × Environment (GGE) biplot analysis identified three mega-environments, with E18 (Indore-H) being both highly discriminative and representative.

conclusionsThe integration of multivariate and multi-trait analyses effectively enabled the identification of high-yielding and physiologically resilient wheat genotypes under drought and heat stress. Genotypes G7, G8, G9, and G13 demonstrated stable and superior performance across environments, making them promising candidates for developing climate-resilient wheat ideotypes. This integrative approach provides a robust framework for sustainable wheat improvement under future climate scenarios.

Indexed as

DroughtsHeat-Shock ResponseTriticumBiomassDrought ResistanceEnvironmentGene-Environment InteractionGenotypeHot TemperaturePhenotypeStress, PhysiologicalDrought stressG×E interactionHeat stressMulti-Environment TrialsSelection indices

Identifiers

PMID42343236
PMCPMC13374278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.