ArticleBMC primary care2026
Recurrent urinary tract infections in primary care: a qualitative study of women's experiences.
Article in BMC primary care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUrinary tract infections (UTIs) are highly prevalent, affecting up to 50% of women during their lifetime. Among these, 20-30% develop recurrent UTIs (rUTIs), defined as ≥ 2 UTIs within 6 months or ≥ 3 UTIs within 12 months. In addition to physical symptoms, existing research describes how rUTIs affect women's quality of life, mental well-being, and intimate and social relationships. Few studies have investigated how women experience encounters with primary care and how rUTIs shape women's self-image and illness perceptions. The objective of this study was to explore how premenopausal women experience the impact of living with rUTIs, as well as how they experience the encounters with GPs in a Danish primary care setting.
methodsThis qualitative study was based on semi-structured interviews with 12 premenopausal women. The data was analysed using thematic analysis.
resultsThree themes were identified: (1) clashes between practice routines and women's perceptions, highlighting how standardised diagnostic and treatment practices were experienced as lacking, and that women expressed a need for clearer management pathways and a more patient-centred approach, (2) lack of validation from the GP, reflecting how women felt dismissed and insufficiently acknowledged in clinical encounters; and (3) gendered illness perceptions, illustrating how these experiences shaped women's understandings of their condition, leading to self-blame, normalisation, or feelings of injustice.
conclusionrUTIs are highly distressing for women and the encounter with primary care often results in frustrations and unmet needs. Perceiving primary care routines as unclear can leave women feeling dismissed, compromise the patient-doctor relationship and affect the women's self‑image and illness perceptions. Improving rUTI management in primary care requires greater attention to women's lived experiences. GPs should recognize the broader impact of recurrent symptoms and ensure clear clinical routines that accommodate the recurrent condition rather than relying on repeated tests and prescriptions. Strengthening shared decision-making and aligning care with women's needs and understandings of health are essential for better support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.