Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42343226›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2026

Machine learning-assisted non-destructive prediction of root architecture in early-stage tomato rootstocks.

Hatice Şeyma Yücel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Hatice Şeyma YücelOndokuz Mayis University, Samsun Vocational School, Samsun, Türkiye. seyma.yucel@omu.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7290-2749

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The architecture of the root system is a primary factor in determining rootstock performance, affecting water and nutrient uptake, biomass accumulation, and overall vigor. However, direct root phenotyping is destructive, labor-intensive, and difficult to do routinely in breeding programs. The present study investigated early root morphological variation among developed interspecific tomato rootstock candidates (Solanum lycopersicum x S. habrochaites). The ability of linear regression and machine learning models to predict root traits from easily measured plant growth parameters was assessed. Nineteen interspecific hybrid rootstock candidates, two commercial rootstocks, and one scion were grown under optimal greenhouse conditions and evaluated at 0, 10, 20, and 30 days after planting. Root length, root surface area, root diameter, and root volume were determined by digital image analysis. In contrast, genotype, plant length, and stem diameter were used as input variables. Significant genotype x sampling date effects were observed for most morphological and biomass traits, indicating dynamic changes in root and shoot development during the first 30 days of growth. The rootstock candidates RSH-17 and RSH-6 generally showed relatively higher root length, surface area, root volume, and biomass accumulation than the commercial rootstocks and scion. XGBoost and OLR were the best predictive models, with R

Indexed as

Machine LearningPlant RootsSolanum lycopersicumBiomassGenotypePhenotypePredictive Learning ModelsMachine learningPlant growth parametersRoot architectureXGBoost

Identifiers

PMID42343226
PMCPMC13471257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.