ArticleNPJ science of learning2026
Development and validation of a multidimensional scale for AI tutoring acceptance in higher education.
Article in NPJ science of learning, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is being increasingly applied in higher education. This has given rise to the issue that, within the published literature, there is still a lack of widely established and psychometrically validated tools for assessing the actual perceived acceptance quality of AI tutoring systems in a comprehensive manner. Although previous studies have examined cognitive patterns in educational technology, few have adequately captured the multidimensional nature of learners' experiences with AI tutoring systems. Existing evaluation models mainly emphasize cognitive outcomes, with less attention given to motivation, relational experience, and trust in AI-assisted teaching contexts. This study aimed to develop and validate a learner-centered scale of AI tutoring acceptance quality. The scale was constructed through literature review, expert consultation, and pre-testing, and comprised four theoretically grounded dimensions: Feedback Quality, Instructional Effectiveness, Interaction Experience, and User Trust. Data were collected from undergraduate students at five universities in Shanxi Province, China. ESEM, bifactor modeling, and reliability analysis indicated a robust bifactor structure, good internal consistency, and acceptable construct validity. The validated scale may serve as a practical tool for AI-supported educational design and future intervention research.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.