ArticleNPJ Parkinson's disease2026
Morbidity, mortality, facility placement and cost of deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease.
Article in NPJ Parkinson's disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an established therapy for advanced Parkinson's disease (PD), but its long-term social and clinical impact has not been well characterized in large cohorts. We conducted a retrospective cohort study using a nationwide hospital database across the United States. Among 79,845 adults hospitalized with PD in 2018 and followed through 2023, 482 underwent DBS implantation. Overlap propensity score weighting was used to balance baseline characteristics. Weighted logistic and gamma regression models estimated adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and cost ratios at 1, 3, and 5 years after discharge. DBS was associated with significantly lower risks of institutionalization at 1, 3, and 5 years (aORs 0.25-0.27) and lower mortality at 1 and 5 years (aORs 0.09 and 0.27). Total healthcare expenditures were also lower in the DBS group (cost ratios 0.68-0.73). Readmission rates were similar between groups but tended to decline over time among DBS recipients. Sensitivity analyses excluding patients with dementia and restricting to non-emergency admissions yielded consistent results. Although DBS implantations were concentrated in large, urban teaching hospitals, outcomes were comparable between teaching and non-teaching institutions. These findings suggest sustained clinical and economic benefits of DBS and highlight the importance of improving equitable access.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.