Observational studyNature communications2026
Risk stratification and relapse pattern in triple-negative breast cancer with pathological complete response after neoadjuvant treatment: the European GAMBIT real-world study.
Observational study in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
40 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant treatment is considered a surrogate of cure in triple-negative breast cancer, yet around 10% of patients still relapse. Whether baseline stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes can stratify this residual risk is unknown. Here, we report on GAMBIT, a multicentric real-world retrospective study of 2457 patients with triple-negative breast cancer or estrogen receptor-low disease, HER2-negative, of whom 1192 obtained a pathological complete response and 690 have evaluable tumor infiltrating lymphocytes. Among patients with pathological complete response, clinical nodal status and tumor infiltrating lymphocytes are independently prognostic and patients with clinical node-positive/low-tumor infiltrating lymphocytes tumors experience substantially worse outcomes, with five-year distant relapse-free survival of 83.4% and overall survival of 85.8%. In this high-risk subgroup, five-year cumulative incidence of central nervous system reaches 7.5%, including 6.9% presenting as isolated central nervous system relapse. In this work, we identify a high-risk subgroup despite pathologic complete response and provide a framework supporting risk-adapted trial design incorporating central nervous system-directed strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.