ArticleHealth & justice2026
Contrasting perspectives and applications of the Good Samaritan Overdose Prevention Law: insights from people who use and distribute drugs in Rhode Island.
Article in Health & justice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe overdose crisis in the U.S is complex, with opioid overdoses compounded more recently with rising stimulant-involvement. Individuals who experience or witness overdoses often avoid calling 911 due to fear of criminal-legal system consequences. Many U.S. states have "Good Samaritan Laws" (GSLs) protecting those seeking help for overdoses, but research is lacking on the understanding and role of GSL in overdose response among people who use stimulants (PWUS) and criminal-legal populations. Our mixed-methods analysis focused on PWUS from a community-based sample in a state with GSL protections, Rhode Island, and participants incarcerated at the Rhode Island Department of Corrections (RIDOC) for charges related to drug distribution. We analyzed survey and interview data to discern differences in knowledge and attitudes regarding Rhode Island's GSL in the two samples.
resultsOverall awareness of the GSL was widespread among the community sample (61.1%) and the RIDOC sample (63.3%); however, more RIDOC participants (70%) than PWUS in the community (42.9%) could accurately describe the law. Participants in both samples reported deeply rooted fears associated with the consequences of help-seeking and skepticism of protections provided by the GSL, particularly around criminal-legal consequences. While the Rhode Island GSL provides protections for probation or parole violations, many RIDOC participants were fearful that these protections would not apply to them, despite the law being amended to provide these protections. Additionally, participants from both samples reflected on differences in help-seeking behaviors among unexpected opioid and stimulant overdoses, discussing how their interpretation of overdose symptoms influenced decisions to call for help (e.g., call 911) or not.
conclusionsVarying degrees of understanding of the Rhode Island GSL, along with fears of police involvement in overdose situations, underscore the need for targeted interventions, policy change, and re-education efforts about overdose prevention and the GSL. Findings can inform policy and professional practices associated with GSLs.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.