ArticleTechniques in coloproctology2026
Effect of home biofeedback treatment in patients with fecal incontinence: a pilot study.
Article in Techniques in coloproctology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFecal incontinence is a common condition that markedly impairs quality of life. Anal biofeedback therapy is recommended as first-line treatment; however, its widespread use is limited by the need for repeated sessions, trained staff, high cost, and patient embarrassment, often resulting in poor adherence. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of self-administered home-based biofeedback therapy and to determine factors associated with treatment success.
methodsThis prospective, single-center study included adult patients presenting with fecal incontinence. Disease severity and quality of life were assessed using the Wexner score, fecal incontinence severity index (FISI), and fecal incontinence quality of life (FIQOL) scale. Baseline evaluations included anal manometry, electromyography, perianal magnetic resonance imaging, or endoanal ultrasonography. All patients underwent a 3-month home-based anal biofeedback program. Primary outcomes were changes in Wexner, FISI, and FIQOL scores after treatment.
resultsBetween September 2019 and January 2021, 24 patients were enrolled. The median Wexner score decreased significantly from 18 (4-20) to 6 (0-16) following therapy (p < 0.001). Similarly, the median FISI score improved from 48 (20-57) to 15 (0-45) (p < 0.001). Anal manometry demonstrated a significant increase in median maximum squeeze pressure from 20 (0-80) mmHg to 60 (17-96) mmHg (p < 0.001). Significant improvements were observed across all four FIQOL domains: lifestyle/coping, self-perception/sexuality, depression/anxiety, and embarrassment. Overall, 86% of patients showed improvement in Wexner scores, ranging from 11% to 100%, and 53% achieved a reduction greater than 50%.
conclusionsSelf-administered home-based biofeedback therapy is an effective and practical treatment for fecal incontinence. Given its simplicity, accessibility, and cost-effectiveness, it represents a valuable alternative to conventional biofeedback therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.