ArticleCommunications biology2026
Meta-awareness, mind-wandering, and the control of automatic external and internal orientations of attention.
Article in Communications biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The 'default' mode of cognition involves simulating internal experiences. However, in some contexts, external focus can become captivating enough to act as the default mode. To examine how these orientations relate, we record fMRI activity in thirty-nine participants as they view naturalistic video clips, each one repeated four times in sequence. When instructed to direct attention externally on the video, most mind-wandering occurs on the last repetition and during less engaging clips. When instructed to direct attention internally on breathing, most mind-wandering occurs on the first repetition and for more engaging clips. Inter-subject correlation, within-subject correlation, and general linear models find similar fronto-parietal networks engaged during transitions from automatic to controlled attention across both conditions, indicating greater overlap in internal and external processing than previously assumed. We conclude that whether the automatic draw of attention is internal or external, and whether its disruptors are internal or external, is context-dependent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.