ReviewNature protocols2026
Multimodal imaging and quantification of lanthanide chelate-labeled micro- and nanoplastics in plants.
Review in Nature protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Tracking Nano- and Microplastics in Plants: Uptake Pathways, Tissue Distribution, and Analytical Strategies from Microscopy to Spectroscopy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding the uptake and distribution of microplastics (MPs) and nanoplastics (NPs) in plants is crucial for assessing their environmental impact. This can be effectively achieved using labeled model particles. While conventional fluorophores are limited by plant autofluorescence, photobleaching, and poor quantitative resolution, in our work we incorporate stable lanthanide (europium) chelates, enabling long-lifetime luminescence detection that effectively eliminates this background interference. Here this protocol integrates time-gated fluorescence imaging microscopy, electron microscopy coupled with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. The solvent swelling labeling method is exemplified using MPs/NPs with different chemical compositions and shapes. For comparison, procedures using MPs/NPs labeled with conventional fluorescent dyes, such as Nile blue chloride (red fluorescence) and the amine-reactive probe 4-chloro-7-nitro-2,1,3-benzoxadiazole (for green fluorescence) are included. The workflow follows a tiered approach: time-gated fluorescence imaging microscopy rapidly localizes particles within tissues, electron microscopy coupled with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy provides subcellular verification and elemental confirmation, and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry quantifies total particle accumulation with high sensitivity. This provides a robust framework for mechanistic studies of MPs/NPs uptake, translocation and partitioning from the subcellular to the whole-plant level. The protocol requires moderate expertise in microscopy and analytical chemistry and takes 2-4 months to complete, depending on the plant species (procedures for hydroponic and soil-grown wheat and lettuce are provided). It is designed specifically for hypothesis-driven research using well-defined, labeled model particles and is not intended for the environmental monitoring of unlabeled plastics in field samples.
Identifiers
42342990What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.