ArticleClinical rheumatology2026
Patient and physician global assessments capture distinct clinical domains in axial spondyloarthritis.
Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatient global (PtGA) and physician global (PhGA) assessments are key components of disease evaluation in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). Although commonly used in composite indices, these measures are often interpreted as interchangeable indicators of disease activity. It remains unclear whether PtGA and PhGA reflect overlapping or distinct clinical domains.
methodsIn this cross-sectional study, 155 patients fulfilling the modified New York criteria, with ASAS classification criteria additionally recorded, were included. All patients had radiographic and MRI-confirmed sacroiliitis. Patient-reported outcomes included PtGA (0-10 VAS), fatigue (0-100), and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). PhGA (0-10 VAS) was assessed independently by the evaluating physician. Laboratory parameters included erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP). Spinal mobility was evaluated using the modified Schober test, tragus-to-wall distance, and chest expansion. Associations were examined using Spearman correlation and multivariate linear regression analyses including demographic variables.
resultsPtGA showed strong correlations with depressive symptoms (ρ = 0.61, p < 0.001) and fatigue (ρ = 0.53, p < 0.001), while correlations with inflammatory markers were weak. In multivariate analyses, BDI (β = 0.087, p < 0.001), fatigue (β = 0.015, p = 0.002), ESR (β = 0.040, p = 0.001), disease duration (β = - 0.068, p = 0.036), and tragus-to-wall distance (β = 0.069, p = 0.040) remained independently associated with PtGA (adjusted R
conclusionPatient and physician global assessments capture distinct clinical domains in axSpA. PtGA is predominantly influenced by psychological burden and fatigue, whereas PhGA is more strongly associated with structural impairment and inflammatory burden. These findings highlight the multidimensional nature of disease perception and support domain-targeted clinical evaluation. Key Points • Patient and physician global assessments in axial spondyloarthritis reflect partially overlapping but distinct clinical domains. • Patient global assessment is primarily driven by depressive symptoms and fatigue rather than objective inflammatory or structural parameters. • Physician global assessment is independently associated with spinal mobility impairment and inflammatory burden. • Interpreting PG-MD differences as domain-specific weighting rather than discordance may improve multidimensional disease assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.