ArticleInsights into imaging2026
A perioperative multi-modal fusion and deep learning-based prognostic system for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a multi-institutional study.
Article in Insights into imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesPrecise perioperative risk stratification for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is essential. We developed a multimodal prognostic model integrating perioperative clinical data, radiomics, and deep learning (DL) features from baseline CT urography to improve survival prediction and guide adjuvant management. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe retrospectively enrolled 623 patients from six institutions, divided into training, internal validation, and independent external validation sets. Four single-modal models (clinical, radiomics, 2D DL, and 2.5D DL) were developed, and an integrated combined model was constructed by fusing their prognostic scores. Performance was evaluated using the C-index, area under the curve (AUC), calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA).
resultsThe combined model consistently outperformed all single-modal models across all cohorts. C-indices reached 0.758 (95% CI: 0.712-0.804), 0.725 (95% CI: 0.651-0.798), and 0.704 (95% CI: 0.631-0.777) in the training, internal validation, and external validation sets, respectively, numerically surpassing the best single-modal models. Notably, our 2.5D DL model (C-index: 0.705) demonstrated a consistent incremental improvement over the 2D DL model (C-index: 0.681) in capturing prognostic information. In external validation, the combined model achieved a 3-year AUC of 0.766. DCA indicated the comprehensive model exhibited excellent calibration and provided the highest net benefits.
conclusionThis multimodal system, featuring a robust 2.5D DL strategy, improves overall survival prediction in UTUC. It offers a valuable tool for accurate perioperative risk stratification immediately after radical nephroureterectomy, demonstrating particularly reliable value for 3-year intermediate-term clinical decision-making. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: This multimodal system advances clinical radiology by fusing perioperative clinical data, radiomics, and DL features from CTU images, enhancing risk stratification accuracy to guide postoperative adjuvant management for UTUC. KEY POINTS: Current prognostic models for UTUC lack accuracy, creating an unmet clinical need for precise perioperative risk stratification to guide adjuvant management. A multimodal prognostic model fusing clinical, radiomic, and DL features from baseline CT urography consistently outperformed single-modality models in predicting overall survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.