ArticleArchives of osteoporosis2026
The development and evolution of the Irish Hip Fracture Database: a quality care initiative 2013-2024.
Article in Archives of osteoporosis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clinical audits are central to quality improvement in healthcare, yet practical real-world descriptions of how they are implemented, governed and sustained are limited. This paper describes the establishment, evolution and impact of the Irish Hip Fracture Database (IHFD) within the Irish healthcare system as an exemplar.
introductionClinical audits compare clinical practice against defined standards to identify areas for improvement and showcase excellence. International literature provides limited insight into how they are governed and sustained. Using the IHFD, a mature national audit, this paper reviews its development, evolution and sustained momentum from 2013 to 2024.
methodsLongitudinal data were captured via the Hospital Inpatient Enquiry (HIPE) system, encompassing all eligible Irish acute hospitals. Included cases were patients aged ≥ 60 years with hip fractures, as defined by IHFD. Three organisational surveys (2016, 2020, 2024) were undertaken to assess hospital resources, care pathways, governance structures and audit supports.
resultsIn total, 41,304 cases were included in the analysis. National coverage exceeded 90% from 2017. Demographic characteristics remain consistent. Improvements in data quality, adherence to Irish Hip Fracture Standards were observed, including geriatrician assessment (11% in 2013 to 86% in 2024) and bone health assessment (65% in 2013 to 90% in 2024). Service reconfigurations and resourcing to support hip fracture care occurred over this period. Engagement with the audit remained robust despite major challenges including COVID-19, a national cyberattack and ongoing health system reform.
conclusionSustained success of a national hip fracture clinical audit requires strong leadership, effective governance, clear clinical standards, accessible data and timely reporting. Continued relevance requires agility and alignment with evolving system needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.