ArticleScientific reports2026
Predicting the strength of waste aggregate concrete blocks using novel hybrid machine learning models and graphical user interface deployment.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Concrete blocks made from waste aggregates have become a promising way to reduce waste and conserve natural resources while still offering good mechanical performance in both solid and hollow concrete blocks. This is especially relevant as more sustainable construction projects increasingly use recycled and alternative materials. This research develops a series of novel hybrid machine learning (ML) models to accurately predict compressive strength, using a dataset of 544 concrete samples from various sources. The six novel hybrid ML frameworks are designed as Hybrid Stacked Ensemble (HSE), Hybrid Residual Learning (HRL), Hybrid Weighted Ensemble (HWE), Hybrid Meta-Learning (HML), Hybrid Bayesian Stacking (HBS), and Hybrid Feature Fusion (HFF). Results show that novel Hybrid Bayesian Stacking (HBS) algorithms deliver excellent predictive accuracy across all evaluation metrics, with (R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.