Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42342810›Full record

ArticleNPJ precision oncology2026

Evaluating neoantigen-vaccine responses through mechanistic and model-based frameworks.

Eman I K Ibrahim, Ida Laurén, Rosanne E Veerman, Siv Jönsson, A Jimmy Ytterberg, Annika Lindqvist, Sara M Mangsbo, Lena E Friberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ precision oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Eman I K IbrahimDepartment of Pharmacy, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Ida LaurénDepartment of Pharmacy, Science for Life Laboratory, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Rosanne E VeermanStrike Pharma AB, Lund, Sweden.
Siv JönssonDepartment of Pharmacy, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
A Jimmy YtterbergDepartment of Pharmacy, SciLifeLab Drug Discovery and Development Platform, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Annika LindqvistDepartment of Pharmacy, SciLifeLab Drug Discovery and Development Platform, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Sara M MangsboDepartment of Pharmacy, Science for Life Laboratory, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Lena E FribergDepartment of Pharmacy, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. lena.friberg@uu.se.

Funding

Cancerfonden 23 2921 Pj
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Therapeutic cancer vaccines activate tumor-specific T-cells to reduce tumor burden, yet face challenges when integrating and translating multi-level complex preclinical data into actionable insights. We present a model-based framework to integrate diverse preclinical data, comparing synthetic long peptide vaccines with or without adjuvant stimuli to a vaccine-drug conjugate approach by Adaptable Drug Affinity Conjugate technology. This technology provides modular and rapid conjugate formation via high-affinity binding between a peptide-tagged vaccine antigen and a CD40-targeting antibody, acting as an adjuvant and delivery vehicle. Our developed semi-mechanistic modelling framework successfully linked dosing to tumor dynamics, incorporating four sub-models: pharmacokinetic, peptide uptake by antigen-presenting cells, T-cell response, and tumor growth in TC-1 and MC38 tumors. Model-based simulations highlighted the importance of affinity conjugation on pharmacokinetics and efficacy. Effector T-cells mediated tumor shrinkage. Antibody dose-dependent effects were identified and quantified in the immune-responsive MC38 model. This framework supports rational vaccine optimization and translational decision-making. The graphical abstract was created in https://BioRender.com .

Identifiers

PMID42342810
PMCPMC13294367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.