ArticleScientific reports2026
Early prognostication for ICU patients with combined respiratory and circulatory failure: an interpretable machine learning approach.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate prognostication in the intensive care unit (ICU) is essential for delivering personalized and ethically sound care, yet it remains a challenge for high-risk patients. This study aimed to develop and validate an exploratory machine learning model for predicting ICU mortality in critically ill patients requiring both mechanical ventilation and vasoactive support. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 4816 patient records from the AmsterdamUMCdb database. The XGBoost model was developed using 66 clinical and laboratory features collected within the first 24 h of ICU admission. The model demonstrated robust discriminatory performance in predicting in-ICU mortality at 24h from admission, achieving in internal validation an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.831 (95% CI [0.799-0.860]), a macro F1 score of 0.735, and a Brier score of 0.130, indicating reliable calibration. Explainable AI methods identified the minimum Glasgow Coma Scale score, patient age, and minimum platelet count as the most significant predictors. In this exploratory study, a machine learning model using single-center early ICU data showed promising performance for mortality prediction in a high-risk population. Given the lack of external or prospective validation, the model should be considered investigational and requires further validation before clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.