Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42342800›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Early prognostication for ICU patients with combined respiratory and circulatory failure: an interpretable machine learning approach.

Adam Piasecki, Kamil Adamczyk, Marcin Śniegowski, Raffaele Mandarano, Beatrice Brunoni, Harm-Jan de Grooth, Paul W G Elbers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Adam Piasecki *Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Institute of Clinical Sciences at the Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden. adam.piasecki@gu.se.ORCID 0000-0002-5088-169X
Kamil Adamczyk *Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, National Medical Institute of the Ministry of the Interior and Administration, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-3714-0117
Marcin ŚniegowskiDepartment of Computer Science, National Medical Institute of the Ministry of the Interior and Administration, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0009-0008-8456-7923
Raffaele MandaranoDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4721-0537
Beatrice BrunoniDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan-Bicocca, Monza, Monza-Brianza, Italy.ORCID 0009-0002-3110-5967
Harm-Jan de GroothIntensive Care Center, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7499-076X
Paul W G ElbersDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Amsterdam Medical Data Science, Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0447-6893

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate prognostication in the intensive care unit (ICU) is essential for delivering personalized and ethically sound care, yet it remains a challenge for high-risk patients. This study aimed to develop and validate an exploratory machine learning model for predicting ICU mortality in critically ill patients requiring both mechanical ventilation and vasoactive support. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 4816 patient records from the AmsterdamUMCdb database. The XGBoost model was developed using 66 clinical and laboratory features collected within the first 24 h of ICU admission. The model demonstrated robust discriminatory performance in predicting in-ICU mortality at 24h from admission, achieving in internal validation an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.831 (95% CI [0.799-0.860]), a macro F1 score of 0.735, and a Brier score of 0.130, indicating reliable calibration. Explainable AI methods identified the minimum Glasgow Coma Scale score, patient age, and minimum platelet count as the most significant predictors. In this exploratory study, a machine learning model using single-center early ICU data showed promising performance for mortality prediction in a high-risk population. Given the lack of external or prospective validation, the model should be considered investigational and requires further validation before clinical application.

Indexed as

Intensive Care UnitsMachine LearningRespiratory InsufficiencyShockAgedBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsCritical IllnessFemaleHospital MortalityHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Learning ModelsPrognosisRespiration, ArtificialRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID42342800
PMCPMC13351017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.