ArticleScientific reports2026
COVID-19-related role disruption and alcohol use disorder risk among adults in South Korea.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This cross-sectional study examined whether COVID-19-related disruption of occupational, social/leisure, and family roles was associated with alcohol use disorder (AUD) risk among adults in South Korea. We analyzed data from 936 adults aged 20-69 years who participated in the 2022 Chungnam Provincial Mental Health Survey. COVID-19-related disruption was assessed across three role domains and categorized as low, moderate, or high. AUD risk was defined using the Korean version of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate adjusted odds ratios (aORs), controlling for sociodemographic characteristics and depressive symptoms. Overall, 129 participants (13.8%) screened positive for AUD risk. The crude prevalence of AUD risk increased across disruption categories: 11.0% in the low-disruption group, 12.3% in the moderate-disruption group, and 20.8% in the high-disruption group. In the fully adjusted model, high disruption was associated with higher odds of AUD risk compared with low disruption (aOR = 1.93, 95% CI: 1.10-3.39; p = 0.021), whereas moderate disruption was not statistically significant. These findings suggest that substantial pandemic-related role disruption may be associated with increased AUD risk, although causal inference is limited by the cross-sectional design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.