Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42342698›Full record

ArticleNature communications2026

Development of response-controlled tall buildings through own-mass mobilisation.

Miguel Martinez-Paneda, Ahmed Y Elghazouli, Kevin Gouder, William Algaard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Miguel Martinez-PanedaDepartment of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0724-7925
Ahmed Y ElghazouliDepartment of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Imperial College London, London, UK. a.elghazouli@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0038-7415
Kevin GouderDepartment of Aeronautics, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3702-7093
William AlgaardArup, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper describes a structural response reduction approach that, rather than adding mass as in conventional mass damping techniques, takes advantage of the large inherent mass present within a building and uses its own mass to generate large levels of reliable damping with minimal differential movements and without the need for frequency tuning. The proposed concept challenges the traditional premise of conceiving tall buildings as rigid, static entities, and exploits movements to improve performance. The underlying premise is investigated using purpose-devised aeroelastic wind tunnel tests on a dynamically scaled model of a 300-metre prototype building in which the damping system is explicitly incorporated. The results show reductions exceeding 70% in peak accelerations and 50% in base moments, relative to a conventional undamped configuration, while maintaining differential displacements between the movable floors and the core below 50 mm under the 50-year return wind. The results of the wind tunnel tests, coupled with complementary numerical studies as well seismic time-history simulations, demonstrate the considerable promise of the proposed system for significantly reducing the demands on the superstructure and foundation. This opens the door for low-carbon, high-performance tall building designs that can enable more resilient and sustainable urban development.

Identifiers

PMID42342698
PMCPMC13448495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.