ArticleScientific data2026
CeraMIRScan: Mid-infrared OCT Scan Dataset for Ceramic Quality Assessment.
Article in Scientific data, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- CeraMIRScan: Mid-infrared OCT Scan Dataset for Ceramic Quality Assessment.Scientific data · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mid-infrared Optical Coherence Tomography (MIR-OCT) is a promising Non-Destructive Testing (NDT) technique due to its high-resolution imaging capabilities and extensive applicability across various industrial domains. Studies developing Deep Learning (DL) models to detect defects in MIR-OCT scans are scarce, and few have been used for ceramic quality assessment. To address this gap, we introduce the MIR-OCT Scan Dataset for Ceramic Quality Assessment (CeraMIRScan), including labels to detect and segment defects. The dataset comprises 29 volumes corresponding to MIR-OCT scans of 3D printed ceramic pieces, decomposed into 21,882 B-scan images, each paired with expert-annotated binary masks capturing defects such as pores, delaminations, and inclusions. Notably, 41.38% of the images contain visible anomalies. To illustrate the dataset's applicability to DL, we provide baseline segmentation results using a U-Net architecture, achieving 80.55% precision, 80.00% recall, and an 80.27% Dice score. CeraMIRScan offers a benchmark resource for advancing automated quality assessment and supports the development of MIR-OCT-based defect characterization methods.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.