Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42342684›Full record

ArticleScientific data2026

The Semantic Units Framework, a technology-agnostic representational approach to FAIR and CLEAR knowledge infrastructures.

Lars Vogt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Lars VogtLeibniz Institute for the Analysis of Biodiversity Change (LIB), Museum of Nature Hamburg, Martin-Luther-King Platz 3, 20146, Hamburg, Germany. lars.m.vogt@googlemail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8280-0487

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (Federal Ministry of Education and Research) 13XP5196F
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This manuscript introduces the Semantic Units Framework, a technology-agnostic representational approach to semantic modularization in which statements and compound meaning structures are treated as first-class semantic units with explicit boundaries, identity, and epistemic status. Motivated by recurring limitations of triple-centric and OWL-based knowledge graphs, the framework shifts the focus from isolated triples to coherent units of meaning that can be referenced, contextualized, and composed. To support scientific generalization beyond individual facts, the framework introduces instance-quantified resource categories (some-instance, most-instances, every-instance, all-instances), enabling explicit representation of existential, prototypical, and universal claims, as well as their negations and contextual qualifications. Combined with semantic units, this approach supports the representation of higher-order statements, epistemic stances, and structured scientific argumentation within a unified semantic model. Rather than proposing a new graph technology, the Semantic Units Framework provides a reusable conceptual foundation that can be realized across existing data and knowledge representation technologies and supports both machine-actionable reasoning and human-interpretable knowledge representation.

Identifiers

PMID42342684
PMCPMC13294353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.